Environmental Condition Monitoring of Infrastructure Projects Based on Wireless Sensor Networks
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54691/p3zhpn25Keywords:
Wireless Sensor Networks, Infrastructure Monitoring, Environmental Sensing, Structural Health Monitoring.Abstract
Infrastructure monitoring represents a critical challenge for ensuring public safety and operational efficiency in modern urban environments, where traditional wired monitoring systems face significant limitations in terms of cost, scalability, and deployment complexity. To fulfill this demand, this paper introduces a complete wireless sensor network (WSN) framework used for infrastructure project environmental condition monitoring, including multi-parameter sensing, a suite of big data applications, and a high-speed data communication protocol with ultra-low power. The designed system is based on a hierarchical network architecture using environment sensors such as temperature, humidity, air quality in addition to structural sensors such as vibration, strain and displacement sensors. Field deployment on four different infrastructure sites (bridges, buildings, rail and road corridors) exhibited excellent performance with respect to network connectivity success of 98.7% and system uptime of 99.2% over the duration of 1 year while being operated continuously. High fidelity environmental monitoring with temperature measurement accuracy of ±0.3°C and humidity monitoring accuracy of ±2%RH was achieved to capture seasonal and pollution oriented infrastructure impacts. Performance evaluation on the network results showed satisfying average data delivery ratio > 97.5%, average packet end-to-end delay of 1.05 s, and energy efficiency of 8.0 nJ/bit, which confirmed the efficiency of the adaptive communication protocols. In Structural Health Monitoring, excellent temperature-strain relationship was found (R² = 0.85) and vibration monitoring could contribute to the early identification of possible structural problems. A machine learning-based tool with Random Forest regression resulted in strong and reliable prediction accuracy (R² = 0.952, RMSE = 5.63 μstrain) of strain based on environmental factors, for early maintenance planning. Energy management techniques like solar harvesting accounted for 65% of power demands and adaptive algorithms led to a reduction of 34% and surpassed projected battery lifetimes of greater than 3 years. Economic evaluation indicates significant benefits compared to conventional systems: 65% cost reduction, 1 year payback, and 115% 10-year ROI. System fault tolerance analysis verified successful operation with a 20% failure rate of nodes or higher, hence proving that INDEPT is resilient enough for deployment in critical infrastructure environments. The research concludes wireless sensor networks can revolutionize infrastructure monitoring, by providing an efficient, low-cost, and reliable means -ability that greatly enhances condition assessment of the environment for present infrastructure management.
Downloads
References
[1] Nkugwa Albert Santos, Azubuike Chukwudi Okwandu, and Dorcas Oluwajuwonlo Akande, “Innovative approaches in structural assessment and maintenance of bridges,” Engineering Science & Technology Journal, vol. 5, no. 10, pp. 2966–2997, Oct. 2024, doi: 10.51594/ESTJ.V5I10.1669.
[2] M. Abdulkarem, K. Samsudin, F. Z. Rokhani, and M. F. A Rasid, “Wireless sensor network for structural health monitoring: A contemporary review of technologies, challenges, and future direction,” Struct Health Monit, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 693–735, May 2020, doi: 10.1177/1475921719854528.
[3] E. Khamespanah, M. Mohaqeqi, M. Ashjaei, and M. Sirjani, “Schedulability Analysis of WSAN Applications: Outperformance of A Model Checking Approach,” Apr. 2022, Accessed: Aug. 19, 2025. [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/2205.10224
[4] O. S. Sonbul and M. Rashid, “Algorithms and Techniques for the Structural Health Monitoring of Bridges: Systematic Literature Review,” Sensors, vol. 23, no. 9, May 2023, doi: 10.3390/S23094230.
[5] R. Yu, Y. Zhang, S. Gjessing, W. Xia, and K. Yang, “Toward Cloud-based vehicular networks with efficient resource management,” IEEE Netw, vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 48–55, 2013, doi: 10.1109/MNET.2013.6616115.
[6] X. Yu, Y. Fu, J. Li, J. Mao, T. Hoang, and H. Wang, “Recent advances in wireless sensor networks for structural health monitoring of civil infrastructure,” Journal of Infrastructure Intelligence and Resilience, vol. 3, no. 1, p. 100066, Mar. 2024, doi: 10.1016/J.IINTEL.2023.100066.
[7] Z. W. Wang, L. P. Xu, Y. L. Ding, R. Z. You, J. Bin Zhu, and S. Shan, “Structural Health Monitoring System for a Complicated Long-Span Continuous Girder Bridge: Implementation and Demonstration,” Int J Distrib Sens Netw, vol. 2024, 2024, doi: 10.1155/2024/6051389.
[8] A. Rana, K. Kaur, P. Kaur, and E. Bhatti, “Energy-efficient protocols for environmental monitoring in wireless sensor networks: A review,” J Ambient Intell Smart Environ, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 139–163, May 2025, doi: 10.1177/18761364241297221.
[9] K. S. Adu-Manu, N. Adam, C. Tapparello, H. Ayatollahi, and W. Heinzelman, “Energy-harvesting wireless sensor networks (EH-WSNs): A review,” ACM Trans Sens Netw, vol. 14, no. 2, Mar. 2018, doi: 10.1145/3183338.
[10] M. Faris, M. N. Mahmud, M. F. M. Salleh, and A. Alnoor, “Wireless sensor network security: A recent review based on state-of-the-art works,” International Journal of Engineering Business Management, vol. 15, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.1177/18479790231157220.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Frontiers in Science and Engineering

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.






