Comparing the Performance of Four Machine Learning Algorithms in Prediction
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54691/h4fw9582Keywords:
Machine Learning, Algorithms, Prediction.Abstract
To investigate and compare the performance of different machine learning algorithms in forecasting, this paper presents a case study on predicting industrial land use. We conduct a benchmarking study employing four representative algorithms: Linear Regression, Random Forest, Naïve Bayes, and Artificial Neural Networks (ANN). The historical data of Shandong Province from 2001 to 2022 was established as the dataset for this study, in which GDP, FAI(Fixed Asset Investment), and IOVAS(Industrial Output Value Above Scale) were set as independent variables, while ILV(Industrial Land Volume)was used as the dependent variable, and four machine learning algorithms, utilized the dataset to complete the training and testing of the models, and finally, this study provides the accuracy of these four machine learning algorithms in industrial land use prediction.
Downloads
References
[1] Yuan Meng, Feng-Rong Zhang, Ping-Li An, et al., Industrial land-use efficiency and planning in Shunyi, Beijing, Landscape and Urban Planning, Volume 85, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 40-48,
[2] Egghe, L., & Leydesdorff, L. (2009). The relation between Pearson's correlation coefficient r and Salton's cosine measure. Journal of the American Society for information Science and Technology, 60(5), 1027-1036.
[3] Afyouni, S., Smith, S. M., & Nichols, T. E. (2019). Effective degrees of freedom of the Pearson's correlation coefficient under autocorrelation. NeuroImage, 199, 609-625.
[4] Maulud, D., & Abdulazeez, A. M. (2020). A review on linear regression comprehensive in machine learning. Journal of Applied Science and Technology Trends, 1(4), 140-147.
[5] Cai, J., Xu, K., Zhu, Y., Hu, F., & Li, L. (2020). Prediction and analysis of net ecosystem carbon exchange based on gradient boosting regression and random forest. Applied energy, 262, 114566.
[6] Izmailov, P., Vikram, S., Hoffman, M. D., & Wilson, A. G. G. (2021, July). What is Bayesian neural network posteriors really like? In International conference on machine learning (pp. 4629-4640). PMLR.
[7] Chen, Y., Song, L., Liu, Y., Yang, L., & Li, D. (2020). A review of the artificial neural network models for water quality prediction. Applied Sciences, 10(17), 5776.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Frontiers in Science and Engineering

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.






