Neural Oscillations and Fronto-Parietal Network Dysregulation in Decision-Making under Uncertainty in Adolescent Depression

Authors

  • Jinling Song
  • Cheng Zhao
  • He Wang
  • Xiaoyi Wang
  • Yingjie Liu
  • Yunen Chen

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54691/mnzgjg56

Keywords:

Adolescent Depression, Decision-making under Uncertainty, Neural Oscillations, Fronto–parietal networks, Reward and Loss Processing.

Abstract

Adolescence is a critical developmental period characterized by ongoing prefrontal–limbic maturation, heightened emotional reactivity, and increased sensitivity to social and environmental feedback, making this stage particularly vulnerable to depressive disorders. Adolescent Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) is associated with pervasive negative cognitive biases, diminished reward responsiveness, and heightened loss aversion, which collectively drive conservative or avoidance-oriented decision-making under conditions of uncertainty. Behavioral evidence indicates that these biases impair adaptive cost–benefit evaluation, limit exploration, and reinforce withdrawal and low motivation. Neurophysiological studies using electroencephalography (EEG) reveal that these behavioral alterations are underpinned by disruptions in neural oscillations and large-scale network dynamics: beta-band activity supports reward integration and goal-directed behavior, frontal midline theta reflects heightened monitoring of negative outcomes and cognitive control, and alpha oscillations mediate inhibitory regulation and attentional gating. In adolescent depression, aberrant modulation of these frequency bands, together with imbalanced fronto–parietal connectivity and reduced engagement of motivational circuits, promotes rigid, risk-averse strategies. Understanding these neural mechanisms provides insight into maladaptive decision-making and suggests that longitudinal studies integrating EEG with structural and functional neuroimaging, as well as interventions such as cognitive training or neurofeedback targeting beta, theta, and alpha dynamics, may enhance reward processing, reduce excessive loss monitoring, and support adaptive neurocognitive development in depressed adolescents.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Shad MU, Bidesi AP, Chen LA, Ernst M, Rao U. Neurobiology of decision making in depressed adolescents: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2011, Vol. 50 (No. 6), p.612–621.e2.

[2] O’Callaghan G, Stringaris A. Reward processing in adolescent depression across neuroimaging modalities. Z Kinder Jugendpsychiatr Psychother. 2019, Vol. 47 (No. 6), p.535–541..

[3] Webb CA, Auerbach RP, Bondy E, et al. Reward-related neural predictors and mechanisms of symptom change in cognitive behavioral therapy for depressed adolescent girls. Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging. 2021, Vol. 6 (No. 1), p.39–49.

[4] Kim N, Bloom PA, Rosellini AJ, et al. Probing neurophysiological processes related to self referential processing to predict improvement in adolescents with depression receiving cognitive behavioral therapy. Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging. 2025, Vol. 10 (No. 5), p.485–494.

[5] Schubert KO, Clark SR, Van LK, Collinson JL, Baune BT. Using hierarchical drift diffusion models to elucidate computational mechanisms of reduced reward sensitivity in adolescent major depressive disorder. BMC Psychiatry. 2024, Vol. 24, p.6353.

[6] Jiang YJY. A theory of the neural mechanisms underlying negative cognitive bias in major depression. Front Psychiatry. 2024, Vol. 15, p.1348474.

[7] Cerniglia L, Di Pomponio I. Decoding adolescent decision making: neurocognitive processes, risk perception, and the influence of peers. Adolescents. 2024, Vol. 4 (No. 2), p.222–225.

[8] Steinberg L. A dual systems model of adolescent risk-taking. Dev Psychobiol. 2010, Vol. 52 (No. 3), p.216–224.

[9] Alloy LB, Abramson LY. Depressive realism: a meta-analytic review of cognitive bias in depression. 1979.

Downloads

Published

24-03-2026

Issue

Section

Articles