Research on Seismic Performance of The Pre-stressed Rocking Bridge Pier with Variable Friction Self-centering Damper System
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54691/f0v3v120Keywords:
Ampers; finite element analysis; initial tensioning stress; spring stiffness; friction coefficient.Abstract
Objectives: In order to enhance the hysteretic energy dissipation capacity of the unbonded prestressed concrete swing abutment bridge under seismic action, a study on the reliability of a variable friction self-resetting damper to improve the energy dissipation capacity of the unbonded prestressed concrete swing abutment bridge is proposed. Methods: The force-displacement relationship of the enhanced rocking bridge pier with variable friction self-resetting dampers was calculated by using theory and finite element method. The consistency of the results obtained by the two methods was evaluated. Three parameters, namely the initial tension stress of the prestressed tendons, the stiffness of the lateral compression spring of the dampers, and the friction coefficient of the dampers, were analyzed. The influence of these parameters on the seismic performance of the enhanced rocking bridge pier system with variable friction self-resetting dampers was studied. Results: When only the initial tensioning stress of the prestressed steel strands is changed to increase it from 800 MPa to 900 MPa, the maximum restoring force increases by 3.5%, the equivalent damping ratio at the maximum displacement of the structure decreases by 5.4%, and the energy consumption increases by 4.3%. When the initial tensioning stress is changed from 900 MPa to 1000 MPa, the maximum restoring force increases by 5.4%, the equivalent damping ratio at the maximum displacement of the structure decreases by 79%, and the energy consumption decreases by 70%. When only the lateral compression spring stiffness of the damper is changed to increase it from 80 kN/mm to 100 kN/mm, the maximum restoring force increases by 3.2%, the equivalent damping ratio at the maximum displacement of the structure increases by 2.7%, the stiffness after yielding increases by 1.7%, and the energy consumption increases by 0.51%. When the spring stiffness of the damper is changed from 100 kN/mm to 120 kN/mm, the maximum restoring force increases by 2.2%, the equivalent damping ratio at the maximum displacement of the structure increases by 0.27%, the stiffness after yielding increases by 1.8%, and the energy consumption increases by 2.5%. When only the friction coefficient of the damper is changed to increase it from 0.2 to 0.23, the maximum restoring force increases by 0.23%, the equivalent damping ratio at the maximum displacement of the structure decreases by 0.6%, the energy consumption value increases by 3.6%, and the residual displacement increases by 9.9%. When the friction coefficient of the damper is changed from 0.23 to 0.25, the maximum restoring force increases by 0.87%, the equivalent damping ratio at the maximum displacement of the structure decreases by 0.2%, the energy consumption value increases by 0.67%, and the residual displacement increases by 5.5%. Conclusions: When the initial tension stress applied to the prestressed tendons is 0.45 times their own yield strength, the spring stiffness of the damper is 120 kN/mm, and the friction coefficient is 0.25, the system has good energy dissipation and self-centering performance. The research results are relatively reliable.
Downloads
References
[1] Ramanathan K, Desroches R, Padgett J E. A comparison of pre- and post-seismic design considerations in moderate seismic zones through the fragility assessment of multispan bridge classes. Engineering Structures[J]. 2012; 45:559-573.
[2] Kawashima K, Macrae G A, Hoshikuma J.I, Nagaya K. Residual displacement response spectrum[J]. Journal of Structural Engineering. 1998.124:523-530.
[3] BECK J L S R I. The seismic response of a reinforced concrete bridge pier designed to step [J]. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 1973, 2(4): 343-358.
[4] G C L. The design and construction of the major bridges on the Mangaweka rail deviation [J].Transactions of the Institution of Professional Engineers New Zealand: Civil Engineering Section, 1988, 15(1): 17-23.
[5] ASTANEH-ASL A, SHEN J H. Rocking Behavior and Retrofit of Tall Bridge Piers; proceedings of the Structural Engineering in Natural Hazards Mitigation, F, 1993 [C].
[6] JIN S S,ZHOU S S,WAN X. Experiment on seismic performance of assembled piers with energy dissipation of replaceable corrugated steel plates[J/OL]. Journal of Jilin University (Engineering and Technology Edition), 1-11[2025-02-21].
[7] GU S. Study on seismic performance of self resetting piers with external viscoelastic dampers[D]. Jilin Jianzhu University,2024.
[8] Zhang J,Shen Y L.Seismic performance of prefabricated pier with replaceable damper[J]. Journal of Chongqing University,2023,46(02):98-106.
[9] LIU X R.Study on the anti-buckling support and seismic performance of continuous beam arch bridges[D].Central south University of Forestry and Technology,2023.
[10] LIU Y F,ZHANG W X,DU X L. Isolation effect and influence parameters of mass rotating wrap rope device for regular continuous girder bridge[J].Journal of vibration engineering, 2024,37(11):1818-1825.
[11] Xue D, Bi K M, Dong H H, et al. Development of a novel self-centering slip friction brace for enhancing the cyclic behaviors of RC double-column bridge bents [J]. Engineering Structures. 2021, 232: 111838.
[12] Hashemi, Ashkan, Zarnani, et al. Experimental Testing of Rocking Cross-Laminated Timber Walls with Resilient Slip Friction Joints[J]. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2018.
[13] XU L H, FAN X W, DAI C S, LI Z X. Mechanical behavior analysis and experimental study on pre-pressed spring self-centering energy dissipation brace[J]. Journal of Building Structures, 2016, 37(09): 142-148.
[14] Yu T H,Zhang C,Bao W. Mechanical performance analysis of a three-dimensional isolation device incorporating dis springs with U-shaped damper[J/OL].Building structre,1-7[2025-01-18]
[15] Pang W,Jiang H,Jia J F. Seismic design and numerical verification of self-centering double-column bridge with replaceable posttensioned strands[J/OL].Journal of Disaster Prevention and Mitigation Engineering.
[16] ASLAM M, GODDEN W G, SCALISE D T. Earthquake rocking response of rigid bodies [J]. Journal of the Structural Division, 1980, 106(2): 377-392.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Frontiers in Science and Engineering

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.